Skip to content
RecTalk home

Reviewed: Metaview

Marta Reacts: Metaview’s AI Screening Agent — Is It Really Better Than a Chatbot?

10 minWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

About this review

Marta Kunysz reacts to Metaview's new AI screening agent, examining whether it genuinely improves upon traditional screening chatbots. The demo shows an AI system designed to conduct two-way conversations with candidates, exploring unclear answers, assessing fit against role requirements, allowing candidates to ask their own questions, and creating recordings and transcripts for recruiter review.

Marta investigates how the approach differs from standard screening tools, questioning how much control recruiters have over AI-generated questions, how well it handles unexpected candidate questions, and why human review remains crucial in AI-assisted hiring. She concludes the screening agent looks genuinely useful because it combines automation with human oversight rather than attempting to replace recruiters entirely, though questions remain about how the agent learns and generates accurate responses.

Key points

  • Metaview's screening agent uses two-way conversation rather than one-way questioning to feel more like genuine interviews.
  • The tool records and transcripts all screening conversations for recruiter review and sense-checking.
  • Recruiters should retain control and human judgement rather than blindly trusting AI recommendations.
  • Questions remain about how the agent learns, generates questions, and handles unexpected candidate queries.
  • The product combines automation with mandatory human review points to keep recruiters in the loop.

Keep watching

More reviews